Life as an Extreme Sport

Radio Silence

Although I have been posting here nearly once a day, if you actually look at the content of the posts, I haven’t said anything of personal substance for a week, and a week is a long time when cancer is an unwelcome guest at your table. So why the radio silence?

I suppose I’ve just felt a bit mute since returning to Albany. It’s not just this blog, or the other blogs I write for (where I’ve also been silent); I’ve ceased responding to most email, creating a large backlog, I’ve largely stopped writing for fun or classes, and have even been quite a bit quieter on the various instant messaging services. I’m just at a bit of a loss for what to say.

Writing, a certain kind of writing anyhow (the narrative kind?), requires, for me, a connection to how I’m feeling. Not a knowing of how I’m feeling, but an actual experiencing of that feeling. And for better or worse (alright, definitely worse), I’ve been kind of numb lately. I know what’s going on, but I just don’t have a way to access it, to feel it. It’s like all those emotions are inside a snowglobe, and I can turn it upside down and shake it and watch the glitter swirl, but I can’t get inside it.

My heart as a snowglobe – it’s an evocative image, one that I should feel something towards, and I simply don’t. I just don’t feel.

I know some of it is simply exhaustion. I hit the ground running when I returned from Albany, rather literally; I ran into a colleague at the airport, picking up a job candidate who was on the same flight from O’Hare. We all ended up talking for over an hour, while we waited for confirmation that our bags were off traveling without us. The next day, interviews, Tuesday – I literally slept all day, jet lag traveling a bit slow. Then class, more interviews, working on an indexing project, more interviews (we’re hiring three new faculty, which means an insane interview schedule for the next couple of weeks). I’m not getting a lot of sleep, and not having much real downtime that isn’t me trying to sleep, or falling asleep at inopportune times.

On top of that, I guess it’s been the month for commentary on the blog. I’ve probably received more feedback in these first few days of 2007 than I have in the last few years. And of course it’s been all over the place. Some friends love that they can follow all aspects of my life here, from school to personal to family and so on. Colleagues have written in to tell me they enjoy reading about themselves, or seeing how I’m doing, or just the breadth and depth of what I opt to write about (thank you, and I will write back). Some friends have stopped talking to me over the content – guess not so much with the friends. And then there are the people who question what I write about, if I’m too open, or writing about things best left private, or if I’m using the blog as a form of therapy, and all the suggestions of how I could improve it if I just changed this one thing (that thing varying, of course, from person to person), and then the folks who’re astonished anyone would suggest I change a thing.

So instead of being paralyzed by the knowledge of People Who Matter reading (even if just occasionally), I now seem to have some sort of paralysis-based-on-rampant-public-opinion. Not that I’m going to change how I do things – I don’t want to be like other blogs, or change a thing; I write what and how I want to write. But of course, now I’m aware of the various lenses people are viewing this through, and what their critique is, and I have their voices in the back of my head when I sit down to write anything. (Frankly, I’d rather put you all in a room and have you duke it out, rather than have you doing it in my head. Unfortunately, I sort of suspect that putting everyone into some sort of American Gladiator deathmatch would be bloody, and deprive the world of some academics that it probably needs.)

And I guess the last bit of it is just – what am I supposed to say? I feel horribly guilty that I’m enjoying my time back in Albany, that I am having fun spending so much time with like-minded people, and I’m enjoying seeing people realize that I actually am smart and I know my subject area much, much better than most people here have given me credit for. I should be in Oregon, not here, not enjoying myself, not having fun, not being cut off from the day to day life and process with Mom. I should have been there Thursday to swallow my fear of needles and learn how to give her shots that will boost her production of white blood cells, instead of sitting in a classroom taking on 20 people who don’t think we have any single, agreed upon comprehensive moral doctrine, tilting at windmills just to tilt at them. I shouldn’t have had to have my father call me with the results of the CT scan, or describe the found tumor over the phone, or hear about the restaging in 6 weeks, and my parents not wanting to know what stage she’s at. I should have been there, asking my own questions to the oncologist, bringing my own concerns and fears and support to the table. I should have been there to argue when the nurses kicked my family out of the room Mom was receiving chemo, limiting them to 15 minute visits once an hour.

I should have been there, and I’m not, and I can’t be, and I don’t know how many times or ways to say it.

And so I retreat. I retreat and I stop talking, because the last thing I want to do when people are already commenting left and right on the style and tone and quality of this blog is to be monotonous and repetitive. Silence on my part is a good way to insure silence on the part of others.

Pet oxygen masks join firefighters’ tools – CNN.com

From CNN,

Fire helmet? Check. Gloves? Check. Axe? Check. Pet oxygen masks? Check.

Increasingly, little oxygen masks for pets are becoming standard equipment for firefighters. Hoping to save cats, dogs and other pets caught in house fires, animal advocacy groups and pet-products suppliers are equipping departments all over the country with them.

The cone-shaped plastic masks, which come in three sizes and fit snugly on snouts, can resuscitate animals suffering from smoke inhalation. They can be used on dogs, cats, ferrets, rabbits, guinea pigs, even birds.

“In the past, we used regular air masks like the firefighters use. In a pinch, it works,” said Norman Flanders, fire chief in this small Vermont town, which was given a set of pet masks by a local animal welfare group Tuesday. “But these masks are designed specifically to fit over the muzzle of a cat or a dog.”

This makes me happy. Several years ago, a friend of mine witnessed a devastating apartment fire. The humans got out fine, but the cat didn’t, and my friend sat crying into her coffee as she told us all about the firefighter who simply wouldn’t give up on the small cat, laying the little furry body out on the concrete and desperately trying to give it CPR with a child-sized mask. Apparently they had to pull the firefighter off the cat, he was just refusing to give up.

So this makes me happy. If you have the spare money, think about buying one of these kits for your local fire station. Everyone’ll appreciate it.

Why I Didn’t Blog for Choice

Yesterday was Blog for Choice day, idea being that all the pro-choice folks celebrating Roe v Wade would blog about it, why they’re pro-choice, get the message out, ho-rah. I, quite obviously, didn’t. I could point to the fact that I had stayed overnight at a friend’s house, as I didn’t have power when I got home Sunday night, or that I got up very early to take a job candidate back to the airport, as his luggage didn’t come in on the same flight he did. (For that matter, neither did my luggage, which apparently thought the next flight in from O’Hare was much better for it than the one I caught.) Or even that I was busy all day with the job candidate, and simply reconnecting with the bevy of grad students I run with – which was admittedly a lot of fun.

But the actual truth of the matter is, I didn’t blog about it because I didn’t want to be associated with it. You see, the thing is, I’m anti-abortion.

Oh sure, I support the rights and liberties granted in Roe v Wave, and I think the idea of making abortion illegal is absolutely a horrible one, all of which makes me pro-choice, but these days pro-choice gets about as hard of knocks as feminism does, and for similar reasons.

For example, a popular pro-choice slogan running around the world right now is “An Intelligent Woman is a Pro-Choice Woman”, or variations on that theme. How utterly asinine and offensive – as if someone who was anti-abortion doesn’t have a brain in her body? (And do note the assumption of opinion on abortion tied to gender; does it not matter if an intelligent man is pro-choice, or are we just assuming men don’t have valid opinions?) There are many different moral points of view that can be coherent, well-thought, intelligent – and anti-abortion. Nothing in the rulebook of life says that if you disagree with a political or moral statement, you must automatically be an idiot – hell, I know quite a few people who’re definitely anti-abortion who have much more intelligent and well-thought positions on it than the sometimes drooling troglodytes on the other side.

The thing is, being pro or anti choice doesn’t map directly on to being pro or anti abortion. And by framing the binary oppositional position the way we have, pro-choice or anti-abortion, you automagically set up a linguistic-based impasse. The very language being used conveys the idea that if you’re not against abortion, you’re for it.

I am not for abortion. I think abortions are awful things, and we should all be working to reduce the number of them performed every year, the number viewed as necessary – either because of unwanted pregnancies, or because of medical issues and potential disabilities. And the only way we’re going to reduce the number of abortions is with comprehensive educational campaigns that work by education, not fear-mongering. By promoting safe sex practices and encouraging thoughtful sex and practical abstinence. By educating about disability, and working to destroy the myth of the perfect child.

All that said, I am also not for making it illegal. Reduction through attrition, not through legislation. The only thing making abortion illegal does is move it to back alleys and other countries, both of which significantly increases the danger to women who opt for that choice.

I genuinely believe that if we stopped slinging mud, stopped insinuating – or flat out saying – that people with differing opinions are stupid, idiotic, morons, and if we stopped focusing on the labels conveniently handed to us by others, we could realize that in actuality, people who identify as pro/anti abortion legislation ultimately all have the same goal, which is to reduce the number of abortions. Instead of focusing on legislation, why not focus, together, on that much more important goal?

random musings from the airport

Catching up on news while I’m waiting to board the plane (all hail free wifi, thank you PDX!), and reading about the Shawn Hornbeck case a little more. Obviously, Bill O’Reilly made a bit of national noise last week (I know, shock, O’Reilly making noise) when he suggested that the teenager had run away from home, and didn’t want to go home for numerous reasons. Now it’s coming out that the teen had contact with police several times during his abduction, but never said anything about being kidnapped – and people are wondering why. Stockholm Syndrome is being suggested and just as quickly dismissed, but what I don’t see anyone saying or comparing is Hornbeck’s experience with that of Elizabeth Smart. She was abducted by a stranger, abused, controlled (clothing, sleep schedule, etc), and her family threatened. She had contact with the public while she was held captive, but never said anything – until she was found and rescued.

Seems pretty similar, and worth comparing, yet no one has. Strange. Woops – we’re boarding! Time for me to migrate back to the East Coast!