Life as an Extreme Sport

to boldly go

I’ve had jobs that are there to just pay the bills. I had an entire career that, like most of the dotcom employees, I fell into sideways, and stayed for the money, not for any particular love of the work. And now I’m working in a field I love, and am passionate about. I live, breathe, sleep and eat it in a way I never truly embraced (but had forced on me) in the computer sector, and I’m enjoying every ulcer-inducing moment of it.

I’m also in a state of some awe at being here, finally, in this position of doing what I love. I’ve been working towards it slowly for years, but I think I really thought it would be several more years, maybe even a decade. So there’s the natural inclination to wonder just how I got so, in my view, lucky! The thing is, though, when I step back, I don’t think luck had anything to do with it. I’m here because of hard work, stubborn determination, and that infectious passion for the subject that lets me step up and speak, regardless of who’s around.

It seems like there’s a growing desire, on a lot of people’s part, to blame their lack of success on things out of their control. If they’d only been born into a rich family, if they could have gone to a fully funded Ivy League college. There’s this belief that some people have an easy life laid out for them, and others are doomed to be living failures, solely because of their birth. There’s no personal accountability, no responsibility for one’s actions – it’s all society, all things outside their hands. It’s an ill-fated, pre-deterministic, martyrdom of “poor me.”

I marvel at people who are capable of living like that, and believing those things. The belief itself seems so toxic! And they would likely look at me, and see someone who’s been handed everything just because I have everything. They wouldn’t see the years living as a broke student, or that I paid for college myself, took out huge loans to get through, worked fulltime while teaching and taking classes. That I busted my ass, and now I’m reaping the rewards. People with that toxic mindset would try to find something in my story to write my success off to, some way where it didn’t stem from my actions. And I think that’s offensive, to me and everyone else who’s bootstrapped their way into success
My father was quite literally raised in a one room cabin in the middle of the Alaskan wilderness. My mother lived in a small, three bedroom house in the deep south – with her sister, parents, and five brothers. Neither had college educations when they married, to say they were anything but very low income class would be a gross misrepresentation of facts. And yet they worked hard, for themselves and their children, and they pulled themselves up to where they are now. But there was not a silver spoon to be had for my infant mouth.
.

I was reading an article yesterday that made me smile, not just because it was a very characteristic interview of someone I have grown to admire greatly, but because of how he speaks of getting one of his most prominent academic positions. He wrote a letter to the new director of a certain center, and basically said “Dear Doc – you would be nuts not to talk with me about the center.” It’s brash, it’s ballsy, and it’s how you get ahead.

Life isn’t going to send you an engraved invitation to join the party; sitting around and moping and waiting will get you nowhere, and fast. Life will happen with or without you; make it happen with you, not to you. Find the thing you’re passionate in, and chase it. Make yourself be noticed, stand up and stand out.

Bloggers Bringing It (aka biting a hand that feeds)

Because I’m pretty certain it’s the kind of thing better not said in the comments there: Art Caplan on the New PHRMA Statement on Gifts: Nonsense on Stilts appears to need renaming, to “commentators dogpile Caplan”, or perhaps “bloggers bite back”. Kind of funny to see; I could go back and piggyback off Daniel and Robert’s comments, but I’m not going to. I apparently post too much over in the comments there, anyhow.

This is one of those times I wish I had the “mood” feature enabled, so that I could accurately express just how amused I am, and what glee the mental image brings.

everyone knows dorms are one big experiment, anyhow

University of Michigan students are about to take part in something rather novel: a living flu experiment. The school has decided to take the over 2,000 students who live in dorms, and use them as a live action, what if, flu exposure and prevention test. Since dorm students live in close quarters, sharing resources like bathrooms, kitchens, and even bedrooms, they make an ideal experimental model to track how flu moves through the population, and what methods might stop it.

So this week, prior to any sign of flu, students were broken into three groups. One group was given hand sanitizer and cotton masks, a second received only the masks, and a third group will have no protection at all, other than what they choose to implement. At the first sign of outbreak of flu in the dorms, the students are to begin following the specific protocol they were given.

That, of course, is where all the questions about validity come in to play. Just how many students are going to follow the protocol they were assigned? Has the control group already been “tampered” with, knowing what the other groups will be doing to protect themselves? (And will this encourage the controls to voluntarily quarantine from the sick, wash their hands more frequently, and so forth?) How do you control for other factors, like being high risk, or around high risk for transmission groups from outside the dorms? (Such as working in child care or a hospital.) Will the virulence of the variety of flu be accounted for? And of course, the cynical question of just who’s sponsoring this, anyhow? Purell?

The epidemiologist in charge of the study wants to create less anecdotal and more concrete evidence that masks are a low cost method of preventing the spread of flu. Quite obviously, low cost and easy to implement methods will be very important when the next flu pandemic comes along. I’m just not certain, without seeing the methodology and other factors, that this study will actually contribute to a solid body of empirical evidence, or just further the anecdotal claims.

Spitzer’s Stem Cell Plan May Not Steamroll Through the Assembly – New York Times

Thomas had voiced some concerns about how NYS was going to implement their stem cell funding, and now it looks like he might have been right to be concerned. An assemblyman has raised significant flags about the stem cell bill, calling much of it “garden-variety economic development pork that’s hiding behind stem cells.” It seems that Mr. Brodsky is not opposed to stem cell research, but instead the fine print in the proposal, which would allow the money to be used for a number of purposes, including new agribusiness, security technologies and nanotech. This appears to be in violation of NYS bond law, which requires bonds to be issues for a single purpose.

And frankly, even if that law wasn’t there, I would want someone to object if the money for stem cell research could potentially be diverted into other projects. If we’re going to fund stem cells, let’s do it right – and not in a sloppy way that will shoot us in the foot rather than contribute to the whole of scientific knowledge and progress.